
⚠️The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
The case involved Bradley Henschke, a logging truck driver who sought insurance benefits through his superannuation fund, the Australian Retirement Trust. Mr. Henschke claimed to have submitted a membership application form opting into income protection cover. However, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) found no evidence that the form was received, determining instead that his account was created by an employer superannuation contribution.
Under the 'Putting Members' Interests First' reforms, automatic death and Total and Permanent Disability (TPD) cover is available only when an account balance reaches $6,000. Mr. Henschke's highest account balance was $706.57, well below this threshold. Consequently, he did not qualify for automatic coverage.
Mr. Henschke argued that the 'dangerous occupation exception' under section 68AAF of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 should apply, given his high-risk profession. This provision allows trustees to elect that members in specified dangerous occupations are covered regardless of account balance. However, the AFCA found no evidence that the trustee had made such an election.
Justice Wheatley of the Federal Court agreed with the AFCA's findings, dismissing Mr. Henschke's application and ordering him to pay costs. The ruling highlights the necessity for individuals in high-risk occupations to proactively verify their insurance coverage within superannuation accounts and to understand the specific conditions and thresholds that apply.
This case serves as a cautionary tale for workers in hazardous industries, emphasising the need for clear communication and documentation when opting into insurance coverage. It also raises questions about the responsibilities of superannuation trustees in activating provisions that could provide essential coverage for members in dangerous occupations.
In conclusion, the Federal Court's decision highlights the complexities of superannuation insurance coverage and the importance of both individuals and trustees ensuring that appropriate measures are in place to protect those in high-risk professions.
Published:Monday, 30th Mar 2026
Author: Paige Estritori
Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.