Insurer Must Pay After Unfounded Fraud Allegations
Insurer Must Pay After Unfounded Fraud Allegations
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
A leading insurance company has been ordered to cover a fire damage claim submitted by a policyholder who passed away from cancer two years ago, highlighting the consequences of unjust fraud accusations.
The claim was initially submitted in January 2022 for damage incurred to the man’s remote metal home in New South Wales. The insurer denied the claim on the grounds that the property was fraudulently misrepresented in terms of its status and functionality.
The policyholder, under heavy medication due to his illness, was questioned by the insurance company’s investigators. Unfortunately, he passed away roughly five months following the submission of the insurance claim. His estate's executor took over the complaint afterwards.
Recently, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) determined that the insurer, IAG, did not provide adequate evidence showing that the policyholder had breached his disclosure commitments. Thus, they must honour the claim.
According to AFCA, “Even if there had been a breach, the insurer has not convincingly shown that it resulted in the renewal of the policy when it would not have been otherwise. Thus, it is fair that the insurer accepts the claim.”
AFCA pointed out that IAG did not submit a declaration from its underwriters to either prove it would not have undertaken or renewed the policy. Despite cautions regarding potential adverse inferences, the insurer failed to provide necessary documentation on its underwriting practices pertaining to this case.
Originally, IAG contended that the policyholder had wrongly described the condition of his property upon policy initiation in October 2019, claiming it was watertight, structurally sound, secure, well-maintained, and inclusive of functional kitchen and bathroom facilities, and specifying its construction date as approximately 2019.
The policy contained a clause explicitly stating, “We don’t insure buildings under initial construction.”
AFCA’s investigation found that, as of the relevant policy renewal date in October 2021, the property's construction was completed, and it had been continuously occupied for over a year, meeting structural and maintenance codes.
“Each renewal constituted a new insurance contract,” the ombudsman declared.
Moreover, AFCA emphasized that the allegation of fraud, which carries grave implications, wasn’t sufficiently supported given that for a misrepresentation to amount to fraud, it must be made either knowingly or recklessly.
EVEN if I had determined that the policyholder breached the disclosure duty-which I have not-the insurer did not provide necessary proof to show it would not have entered the 2021-22 policy period without the alleged breach,” AFCA noted.
In their ruling, AFCA also highlighted the insurance contract and product disclosure statements omitted critical information regarding the duty to avoid misrepresentation, relevant disclosure duties, or consequences of any such breaches.
For more information on the ruling, it can be reviewed here.
This article has been adapted from one originally published by Insurance News Magazine.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
A recent New Zealand life insurance dispute has put a practical but often overlooked issue in the spotlight: having cover is only part of financial protection. Policyholders also need to know who owns the policy, how documents can be accessed, and what happens when urgent health circumstances arise. - read more
NSW Fair Trading’s criminal proceedings against Network Strata Services Pty Ltd, trading as Netstrata, have pushed strata governance and insurance transparency back into the national spotlight. The regulator alleges the company and its director and licensee in charge breached statutory obligations connected with strata scheme management in New South Wales, including alleged failures around conflicts of interest, undisclosed financial benefits and information provided to the regulator. - read more
A fresh dispute over the proposed Insurance Brokers Code of Practice has sharpened the focus on transparency for Australian small businesses. Industry figure John Trowbridge has criticised gaps in the draft code, particularly around whether brokers should disclose commissions and other remuneration to all clients, not only those captured by narrower product or client categories. - read more
A recent Australian Financial Complaints Authority decision has put a spotlight on a detail that can be easy to overlook: how an income protection policy defines income. In the case, a policyholder receiving payments under an employer-arranged group income protection policy argued that regular sales commissions should be counted when calculating his pre-disability income. - read more
A fresh dispute over Australia’s insurance broking standards has put transparency back in the spotlight for small business policyholders, including personal trainers, fitness instructors and studio operators. On 17 July 2026, several consumer and strata owner groups withdrew from consultation on the National Insurance Brokers Association’s rewritten Insurance Brokers Code of Practice, arguing that industry self-regulation does not go far enough on conflicted payments and commission disclosure. - read more
For tradesmen and trade professionals, venturing into the world of business comes with its set of challenges and risks. Among the myriad of precautions to consider, one critical safeguard stands out for its ability to protect both the tradesperson and their clients: Public Liability Insurance. This form of coverage is not just a safety net; it is a cornerstone of a responsible business practice within the trade industry. - read more
Public liability insurance is an integral safety net designed to protect businesses from the financial risks associated with lawsuits or claims. It provides coverage when a business is found legally responsible for personal injury to a third party or damage to their property. This form of insurance can significantly reduce the burden of legal fees, compensation claims, and other associated costs that may arise from unforeseen incidents. - read more
Liability insurance is a crucial form of protection that offers coverage against claims resulting from injuries and damage to people or property. Within the bustling landscape of Australian businesses, possessing this form of insurance is key to financial security and continuity. It acts as a safety net, ensuring businesses can manage risks without bearing the full brunt of potentially costly legal claims. - read more
Liability insurance is a form of coverage that protects businesses against claims resulting from injuries and damage to people or property. It provides crucial peace of mind, ensuring that your business is shielded from potentially devastating financial losses due to lawsuits or claims against it. - read more
Running a small business in Australia comes with its own set of challenges and risks. One crucial aspect that should never be overlooked is insurance, particularly public liability insurance. The reason is simple: it offers essential protection against claims of property damage or personal injury caused by your business operations. - read more
Start Here !
Knowledgebase
Double Indemnity: A clause or provision in a life insurance policy that doubles the payout in cases of accidental death.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.