Insurer Must Pay After Unfounded Fraud Allegations
Insurer Must Pay After Unfounded Fraud Allegations
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
A leading insurance company has been ordered to cover a fire damage claim submitted by a policyholder who passed away from cancer two years ago, highlighting the consequences of unjust fraud accusations.
The claim was initially submitted in January 2022 for damage incurred to the man’s remote metal home in New South Wales. The insurer denied the claim on the grounds that the property was fraudulently misrepresented in terms of its status and functionality.
The policyholder, under heavy medication due to his illness, was questioned by the insurance company’s investigators. Unfortunately, he passed away roughly five months following the submission of the insurance claim. His estate's executor took over the complaint afterwards.
Recently, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) determined that the insurer, IAG, did not provide adequate evidence showing that the policyholder had breached his disclosure commitments. Thus, they must honour the claim.
According to AFCA, “Even if there had been a breach, the insurer has not convincingly shown that it resulted in the renewal of the policy when it would not have been otherwise. Thus, it is fair that the insurer accepts the claim.”
AFCA pointed out that IAG did not submit a declaration from its underwriters to either prove it would not have undertaken or renewed the policy. Despite cautions regarding potential adverse inferences, the insurer failed to provide necessary documentation on its underwriting practices pertaining to this case.
Originally, IAG contended that the policyholder had wrongly described the condition of his property upon policy initiation in October 2019, claiming it was watertight, structurally sound, secure, well-maintained, and inclusive of functional kitchen and bathroom facilities, and specifying its construction date as approximately 2019.
The policy contained a clause explicitly stating, “We don’t insure buildings under initial construction.”
AFCA’s investigation found that, as of the relevant policy renewal date in October 2021, the property's construction was completed, and it had been continuously occupied for over a year, meeting structural and maintenance codes.
“Each renewal constituted a new insurance contract,” the ombudsman declared.
Moreover, AFCA emphasized that the allegation of fraud, which carries grave implications, wasn’t sufficiently supported given that for a misrepresentation to amount to fraud, it must be made either knowingly or recklessly.
EVEN if I had determined that the policyholder breached the disclosure duty-which I have not-the insurer did not provide necessary proof to show it would not have entered the 2021-22 policy period without the alleged breach,” AFCA noted.
In their ruling, AFCA also highlighted the insurance contract and product disclosure statements omitted critical information regarding the duty to avoid misrepresentation, relevant disclosure duties, or consequences of any such breaches.
For more information on the ruling, it can be reviewed here.
This article has been adapted from one originally published by Insurance News Magazine.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
NSW Fair Trading’s criminal proceedings against Network Strata Services Pty Ltd, trading as Netstrata, have pushed strata governance and insurance transparency back into the national spotlight. The regulator alleges the company and its director and licensee in charge breached statutory obligations connected with strata scheme management in New South Wales, including alleged failures around conflicts of interest, undisclosed financial benefits and information provided to the regulator. - read more
A fresh dispute over the proposed Insurance Brokers Code of Practice has sharpened the focus on transparency for Australian small businesses. Industry figure John Trowbridge has criticised gaps in the draft code, particularly around whether brokers should disclose commissions and other remuneration to all clients, not only those captured by narrower product or client categories. - read more
A recent Australian Financial Complaints Authority decision has put a spotlight on a detail that can be easy to overlook: how an income protection policy defines income. In the case, a policyholder receiving payments under an employer-arranged group income protection policy argued that regular sales commissions should be counted when calculating his pre-disability income. - read more
A fresh dispute over Australia’s insurance broking standards has put transparency back in the spotlight for small business policyholders, including personal trainers, fitness instructors and studio operators. On 17 July 2026, several consumer and strata owner groups withdrew from consultation on the National Insurance Brokers Association’s rewritten Insurance Brokers Code of Practice, arguing that industry self-regulation does not go far enough on conflicted payments and commission disclosure. - read more
Australia’s life insurance sector has welcomed the Federal Government’s updated expectations for APRA and ASIC, a policy signal that could shape how insurers balance consumer protection, affordability and innovation. The new expectations ask the regulators to keep the financial system safe and stable while also supporting competition, productivity and proportionate oversight. For life insurance customers, the practical question is whether that balance leads to clearer products, better service and cover that remains within reach. - read more
Public liability insurance is an integral safety net designed to protect businesses from the financial risks associated with lawsuits or claims. It provides coverage when a business is found legally responsible for personal injury to a third party or damage to their property. This form of insurance can significantly reduce the burden of legal fees, compensation claims, and other associated costs that may arise from unforeseen incidents. - read more
As a business owner, one of your top priorities is safeguarding your enterprise from unforeseen events that could lead to financial liabilities. Liability insurance is the cornerstone of this protection, offering a safety net against claims that could otherwise derail your business's financial stability. However, it's not just about having insurance; it's crucial to ensure your coverage is current and adequate for your evolving business requirements. - read more
Today, we're diving into the world of public liability insurance, a crucial topic for anyone running a small business or working as a self-employed professional in Australia. - read more
Public liability insurance is a type of coverage designed to protect businesses and individuals from the financial fallout associated with claims for injury or damage caused to third parties. It is particularly crucial for event organizers, who are responsible for ensuring the safety and security of attendees, vendors, and participants. - read more
Public liability insurance is a type of insurance policy that provides coverage for businesses and individuals against claims made by third parties for injuries or damages sustained while on their property or as a result of their activities. - read more
Start Here !
Knowledgebase
Actuary: A professional who analyzes the financial costs of risk and uncertainty using mathematics, statistics, and financial theory.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.