
⚠️The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
A critical limitation of the ERS is its exclusion of claims handling from eligible activities. This restriction poses a significant barrier to innovation, as claims handling is a fundamental component of insurance operations. IA highlights that no insurance-specific service providers have successfully applied for or utilized the ERS, underscoring its limited applicability to the sector.
The ERS's design, characterized as a passive exemptions framework with weak transition pathways, emphasizes the underlying product over enabling technology. This approach is misaligned with the needs of insurtech startups, which often require scalable solutions and credible claim-loss experience to validate their models. The effort required to obtain an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL) can exceed the resources of a startup before achieving product-market fit, further hindering innovation.
IA advocates for a more supportive regulatory environment that allows insurers and agencies to test innovations such as parametric products, AI-driven underwriting, and automated claims processing without the full obligations upfront. They recommend implementing tiered pathways that distinguish startups from incumbents, establishing risk-based limits for insurance tests, and enhancing coordination across regulatory bodies.
For Australian businesses, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), the stagnation in insurance innovation means continued reliance on traditional products and processes. A more dynamic and supportive regulatory framework could lead to the development of tailored insurance solutions that better meet the evolving needs of SMEs, offering more flexibility and potentially more affordable coverage options.
In summary, while ASIC's ERS was a step towards encouraging financial innovation, its current structure and limitations have rendered it ineffective for the insurance sector. Addressing these shortcomings through regulatory reform could unlock new opportunities for innovation, benefiting insurers and policyholders alike.
Published:Saturday, 28th Mar 2026
Author: Paige Estritori
Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.