AFCA Rules Against Engine Theft Coverage in Motor Policy Dispute

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The crux of the AFCA's ruling rested on the lack of evidence indicating the claimant's ownership of the engine, thereby negating any financial loss acknowledged under the policy. According to an AFCA ombudsman, even if ownership was established, the engine's status-intended but not installed-did not align with the policy’s definitions of 'vehicle' or 'modifications.'

Furthermore, the complainant had not opted for an additional policy benefit that could extend the cover to spare parts awaiting assembly into the insured vehicle. As a result, the claim for engine theft remains outside the current policy's provisions.

The insured also sought assistance from IAG to recover costs from the repairer, a request AFCA deemed inappropriate, emphasizing that issues pertaining to the repairer fell outside the scope of his insurance contract. This path remains a private matter between the claimant and the repairer involved.

This case highlights the critical importance for policyholders to thoroughly understand the intricacies and limitations of their insurance policies, particularly regarding coverage for vehicle components not yet integrated into the car. It demonstrates the necessity for explicit policy terms and the potential need for additional cover options to protect significant investments like spare parts.

The decision may prompt individual insurers and the wider insurance market to reassess coverage options related to spare parts and modifications to align with consumer expectations and reduce disputes. Policyholders are advised to consult their insurers to ensure adequate coverage, especially when dealing with valuable customizations or restorations. This incident serves as a valuable reminder to scrutinize insurance policies closely and engage with insurers proactively to clarify available coverage options.

Published:Sunday, 4th May 2025
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Why Insurer Resilience Rules Matter for Shop Owners

28 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Australia’s insurance sector is adjusting to a tougher operational risk environment, with APRA’s CPS 230 standard placing greater emphasis on resilience, business continuity and oversight of critical service providers. While the rules are aimed at regulated financial institutions rather than individual shop owners, the flow-on effects are worth watching for retailers, cafés, convenience stores and other small businesses that rely on insurers when disruption strikes. - read more

Why Data Breach Trends Matter for Office-Based SMEs

28 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Australia’s latest data breach reporting is a timely reminder that cyber exposure is no longer confined to large corporates or technology companies. For office-based SMEs, the risks often sit in everyday systems: email accounts, cloud platforms, payroll files, client databases, accounting software and shared devices. When those systems are compromised, the impact can move quickly from an IT inconvenience to a business interruption, liability and reputation problem. - read more

What complaint trends mean for life insurance buyers

28 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent industry attention on insurance complaints is a useful reminder that buying life cover is not only about finding the lowest premium. For New Zealand households, the real test of a policy often comes years later, when a claim is made and the insurer checks whether the policy terms have been met. - read more

Why insurance complaint trends matter before you need to claim

28 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Fresh industry attention on insurance complaints is a useful reminder that the real test of any policy comes at claim time. For New Zealand households relying on regular wages, the issue is especially important when the cover is designed to replace income after illness or injury. - read more

What Stronger Conduct Expectations Mean for Income Protection Customers

28 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

New Zealand’s financial conduct regime continues to reshape expectations for insurers, with the Financial Markets Authority keeping close attention on whether financial institutions can demonstrate fair outcomes for customers. For people who rely on Income Protection Insurance, the shift is more than a compliance story. It affects how policies are explained, how claims are handled, and how insurers monitor whether customers are receiving value from their cover. - read more

Click for more Insurance News