AFCA Sides with Homeowners in Landmark Insurance Dispute Over Property Cracks

3

Challenging Youi's stance, the homeowners took their dispute to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), which ultimately supported their case. The complainants argued that the damage, discovered shortly after the pipe leak in early 2023, was directly linked to the water escape.

An assessment by Youi's engineer had attributed the damage to ineffective drainage and was compounded by factors like inadequate footings and proximity to large trees. However, the homeowners countered this with their own engineer's assessment, indicating that the most severe damage occurred precisely where the leaked water had pooled, suggesting a strong correlation with the pipe burst rather than tree-induced movement.

AFCA emphasized the insurer's burden to establish that exclusions apply, noting Youi's lack of compelling evidence in their conclusions. The ombudsman's analysis favoured the complainants' expert findings, discounting the earth movement exclusion as unfounded given that the primary cause was the water leak.

The resolution mandates that Youi settle the claim, including coverage for temporary accommodations if necessary. Additionally, the insurer is required to compensate the homeowners with $1060 for professional fees alongside $4000 for non-financial losses, largely due to the distress caused by Youi's initial refusal to renew their policies. This decision was partly attributed to the insurer's premature policy termination despite the unresolved claim and ongoing case which involved credible external expert evaluations.

This development underscores the critical role of AFCA in ensuring that insurers adhere to fair practices and underscores the importance of homeowners closely documenting damage events to support their claims effectively.

The decision not only marks a significant outcome for consumer rights but also serves as a cautionary tale for insurers about the importance of comprehensive, evidence-based assessments before claim denial.

Published:Tuesday, 22nd Apr 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

ClearView Names New Underwriting Head Amidst Strategic Changes 30 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori ASX-listed life insurer ClearView has announced the appointment of Peter Tilocca as Head of Underwriting, coinciding with key updates to its underwriting standards and definitions. Tilocca's extensive two-decade career in Australian underwriting includes leadership roles at Zurich, Noble Oak, One Path Life, and RGA Australia. His new role with ClearView commenced on 30 June. - read more

Ombudsman Supports Theft Claimant in Home Business Coverage Dispute 30 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori A recent case has seen a policyholder triumph over her insurer after the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) ruled in her favour following a contentious dispute regarding home business operations. The controversy arose when the woman's theft claim was denied by her insurance provider, IAG, over allegations of fraudulent misrepresentation about the use of her rental property. - read more

AFCA Upholds Insurance Fraud Ruling Over Disputed Possum Accident 26 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori A motorist's claim that he crashed into a tree to avoid a possum has been denied by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), which supported the insurer's fraud decision. The incident involved the driver crashing his Jeep—insured for over $20,000—on a dimly-lit street, purportedly avoiding the rain-soaked motorway en route to the store. - read more

Code Watchdog Criticises Insurer for Misleading Rejection Letters 24 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori The Life Code Compliance Committee has recently reprimanded a life insurance provider for issuing misleading rejection letters to policy applicants. These letters were deemed 'ambiguous and contradictory' and failed to clearly inform applicants of their review options after being denied coverage. - read more

Insurer Ordered to Pay Full Claim for Confusing Patio Coverage 23 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori A recent ruling mandates that an insurer must fully honor a storm-related claim due to ambiguous policy wording regarding items in open areas. The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) determined that the insurer's restriction on coverage for items in a patio area was unfounded, as the policy's phrasing was not clear. - read more