Privacy Rights Prevail: Claimant Sets Precedent in Insurance Information Access Dispute

3

The claim originates from an incident in January when the traveler's belongings, including a bag, were stolen during an overseas trip. In response, SCTI requested a standard consent from the policyholder to acquire "any further information reasonably required" for their investigations.

The claimant, however, raised privacy concerns and proposed a modified consent form. His version mandated that SCTI summarize any information they intended to retrieve and secure written consent before sharing it with third parties.

Insisting on his privacy, the claimant also declined to share his phone number, preferring to handle communications through email, which SCTI found insufficient for the investigation process.

The insurer argued that under the terms and conditions agreed upon by the policyholder at the time of purchase, such an authorization was necessary to ensure comprehensive investigations without any limitations. SCTI warned they could not advance the claim unless the policyholder complied with their request.

On the contrary, the claimant contended that his modifications wouldn't hinder SCTI's access but would merely control the flow of his personal data. He asserted it was unreasonable for SCTI to gather information without his explicit acknowledgment, citing concerns over what he termed as "easily breachable" information.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) sided with the claimant, emphasizing the need to balance the claimant’s privacy with the insurer's requirement for a thorough investigation.

AFCA noted that SCTI’s request was quite broad, lacking specificity about the necessity of each piece of information. The authority pointed out SCTI's failure to demonstrate any substantial prejudice caused by limiting authority over the claimant's information.

"While requesting limited authority/ies from the complainant presents a greater administrative and time burden for the insurer, it has not shown that doing so would inhibit its ability to investigate the claim or is otherwise unworkable or particularly onerous," the ombudsman remarked.

The ombudsman further commented, "In the absence of the insurer providing reasons to the contrary, the complainant is entitled to know the parties to whom information is being provided to and sought from, its scope, and the opportunity to consent to each."

Thus, SCTI cannot delay claim assessments on the grounds of incomplete standard authorization forms, obliging them to provide the claimant with forms that recognize his conditions.

AFCA also determined that while the claimant may continue using email for routine communication, he must supply his phone number or relevant phone records if deemed vital to the investigation. This case underlines the evolving dynamics between privacy rights and corporate processes, as reported by Insurance News.

Published:Monday, 25th Nov 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Insurer Prevails in Fraudulent Rental Claim Dispute 17 Mar 2025: Paige Estritori The insurer QBE has successfully reversed a payout concerning a fraudulent rental claim, as determined by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA). The controversy arose from a claim lodged under an owners’ corporation residential strata plan for water damage and subsequent rental losses dating back to a January 2022 storm. - read more

Australia’s Insurtech Rise: Pioneering Innovation in Insurance 12 Mar 2025: Paige Estritori The Australian insurtech sector is steadily gaining prominence with innovative products aimed at boosting efficiency, security, and customer interaction. According to a recent report titled 'Insurtech Down Under: Trends, Tech and Triumphs,' the sector's growth is accelerating, supported by strategic investments and technological advancements. - read more

Hacked Company Loses Insurance Battle Over Customer Payment Scam 11 Mar 2025: Paige Estritori A company recently faced a significant setback after losing an insurance claim dispute related to funds stolen in a fraudulent email scheme. Cybercriminals infiltrated the business's email system, sending out fake invoices that directed clients to pay into a bogus bank account. Consequently, two customers inadvertently transferred a total of $66,148 to the fraudulent account. Attempts to retrieve this money were unsuccessful, and the customers refused further payments to the company. - read more

Australia Underwriting Rises to Meet Complex Insurance Challenges 11 Mar 2025: Paige Estritori In an evolving insurance landscape where traditional underwriters are hesitant to cover high-risk scenarios, Australia Underwriting has strategically positioned itself to fill this crucial gap. The company has become recognized for its expertise in handling difficult-to-place insurance risks, often ignored by larger insurers focused on lower-risk ventures. Founded by industry veteran George Vincent, the firm has capitalized on unserved market segments and emerged as a vital player in the Australian insurance space. - read more

Ombudsman Orders Higher Compensation From Insurer Over Mould Dispute 10 Mar 2025: Paige Estritori The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has directed insurance provider Hollard to enhance its compensation payout to a homeowner following a failed attempt to remediate mould contamination in the owner’s property. Despite previous repair efforts by Hollard, lingering mould issues persisted, prompting further disputes. - read more